This project has moved. For the latest updates, please go here.
2

Closed

Dual license via MIT

description

@PandaWood

LGPL is problematic for some people.

Any objection to having a dual license? So "also release under MIT"
Closed May 14, 2014 at 12:38 AM by PandaWood
Converted to MIT (dual license wasn't possible)

comments

PandaWood wrote Mar 24, 2014 at 4:13 AM

Yep, no worries.
Actually, I couldn't do "dual license" so I chose MIT and put my and the originator's name ("Phillip Pettit") on the copyright. With the year that he handed it over to me as the copyright date.
Probably arbitrary really.

SimonCropp wrote May 14, 2014 at 1:24 AM

Thanks. MIT is a better license anyway :)